Categories
Greenhouse News

Production Pitfalls (Part 1)

Fungus Gnat (and Sciarid Fly)

Paddy de Vries a hydroponic specialist in South Africa will be visiting New Zealand in October.  Paddy has been in the South African covered crop industry since graduating from The University of Stellenbosch in 1987 with a BSc Agric and  2 BSc Hons. degrees.  He has vast experience and has supplied me with insights into the South African greenhouse industry.  Paddy wrote an excellent newsletter regarding 'production pitfalls'.  Paddy has allowed Grower2Grower to publish this newsletter in a series of articles.  The technical nature of the articles is relevant and applicable for NZ growers.  In this edition, following on from the fantastic article supplied by Lincoln University I want to highlight the work Paddy has carried out studying Fungus Gnat and Sciarid Fly.

 

 “The best approach to preventing a problem from taking hold, and painstaking process of ridding the crop of the malady is a three-pronged approach: Identification, prevention and, unfortunately for those infected, treatment” Paddy de Vries.

 

Fungus Gnat (& Sciarid Fly)

The Fungus Gnat (Mushroom Fly, Shore flies or Sciarid Fly) is endemic to all but new greenhouses and are found in damp areas near the soil/ root medium surface. At 23-34°C the life cycle can be as little as ± 10 days (egg-larva-pupa-adult) where approximately 100 new flies from each female can be the result.  It is an extremely serious problem in all greenhouse situations in that the larvae damage roots, allowing for easy pathogen infection. The flies sit on infected areas and are mechanical vectors for diseases such as Pythium, Fusarium, Phytophthora spp., GSB, Pseudomonas spp. etc.  The importance of controlling this pest is often overlooked in that the symptoms of other diseases, spread by the gnat, are treated, while re-infection continues unabated due to the presence of Fungus Gnat.

 

Identification

Small mosquito or fly-like black or grey insects (3 dark smudgy dots on the wings of some spp.) that “aimlessly” fly around the greenhouse near the medium surface, especially right after you water or disturb the soil. The adult midges are drawn to wet swampy areas where decaying plant material, algae and fungi proliferate.   Eggs are laid in these damp areas.  Other than most other insects, the adults are drawn to odours of plant decay (as is found on the damp medium surface and standing water in our structures) rather than colour (e.g. yellow chroma’s seen in commercial sticky traps).   The larvae appear as tiny semi-transparent worms with a dark coloured head that move around in the top layer of soil, mainly feeding on decaying plant material, fungi and algae, but also feed on and damage roots.

 

Examples of Gnat Larva on Fruit and plant material.  Above and below.

Adult Phase Identification: Small black or grey gnats (mosquito-like) with dark smudgy dots on wings. 

Gnat pupae on growth-medium, in a highly infected greenhouse.  Look closely and you can see a lot more than the two highlighted.

Fungus Gnat Pupae

 

Prevention

  1. Avoid over irrigation and identify areas in the greenhouse that have standing water with moss or algae growing there.Typical problem areas are: Run-off furrows, uneven floors where water pools, on top of nutrient irrigated growing medium.The most inexpensive first step in control is to treat these breading areas by spreading agricultural lime (NOT on growing medium), which will:
  2. “Dry out” the algal growth, and disguise the smell of the algae and moss, and
  3. Change the pH of the wet areas, which will make it less favourable for the fungus gnats to breed in.
  4. By breaking the life cycle at the larval stage, you will increase your chances of getting rid of the gnats.
  5. Ensure that all areas inside and within 20m of the structure is free of any weeds and freestanding water, as gnats may breed in these areas, entering the structures at the doors, windows and with personnel.

 

Treatment

  1. Large areas of yellow sticky traps are effective in reducing the number of fungus gnat adults if placed near the medium surface.
  2. By placing of a layer of e.g. Vermiculite on top of the medium, wet patches can be prevented since it dries out quickly after irrigation:  Fungus gnats require moisture in the top few cm of medium in order to complete their life cycle.
  3. Few “hard chemicals” are really effective, and some can even have a suppressive effect on plant growth.
  4. A number of Biological control agents (“Beneficial’s”) for treatment against larvae are available that can be extremely effective in breaking the life cycle.

 

Potential Bio-Controls:

  1. Fungus: Beauvaria bassiana                             
  2. Bacteria: Bacillus thuringiensis isrealensis         
  3. Predatory mite: Macrocheles robustulus                      
  4. Entomopathogenic nematode: Steinernema feltiae                             

Macrocheles robustulus.  Against Eggs, larvae, pupae.

 

Article content “Brought to you by Intens Agri Hydro” For more information, feel free to contact Paddy de Vries or Liandra von Below de Vries at: into@intensagri.co.za or telephone +2783 420 1392

I appreciate your comments.  Please feel free to comment below or on the grower2grower Facebook page:

https://www.facebook.com/StefanGrower2grower/

 

Categories
Greenhouse News

TOMSYSTEM

THE MOST EFFICIENT PLANT TYING SYSTEM IN THE WORLD!

 

TomSystem is an innovative plant staking system for greenhouse crops – it ties the plants onto the twine using galvanised metallic staples. This new tool allows a variety of crops to be tied swiftly and simply making it the most efficient machine available in the market.

 

 

The TomSystem was designed by Spanish company Agrifast, a subsidiary of Grupodesa which is one of Europe’s leading industrial groups in the fastenings sector. Following extensive trials in Holland the original Version.1 model was launched commercially in late 2012. Following further development, and reacting to great feedback from end users, the new Tomsystem V 2.0 was released in 2017. The new V 2.0 model is 350 gm lighter and more ergonomic then it’s predecessor making it much easier to use.

 

Tomsystem V 2.0

 

 

A MULTITUDE OF USES

The TomSystem was originally developed for use with tomato plants. However, it was quickly identified that the system was equally effective when used with cucumbers, peppers and aubergines.

 

 

KEY ADVANTAGES

The Tomsystem provides a variety of benefits to increase productivity and profitability. Key advantages include:

 

1. No specialized labour is required – users can be proficient in the greenhouse within 1 – 2 weeks

2. Clipping is faster (up to 60% more efficient than other traditional methods once proficient)

 

 

 

3.  The V46 clip used in the Tomsystem is biodegradable

4.  Clips are healthier on the plant – Tomsystem prevents stem breakage and damage to plants

 

 

 

 

Silex Tools Ltd (www.silextools.co.nz)  based in Nelson, are the New Zealand agents for the Agrifast Tomsystem. They can assist with the implementation of this product into your Greenhouse. For more information please contact Rod Sharp on Mob (021) 799 992 or email rod@silextools.co.nz.

 

 

Categories
Industry Profile

Tina Weng, Cucumber Grower

There is a great, long-term future for growing cucumbers

Tina and her family moved to New Zealand in 2002, when she was just 14 years old.  Tina was born and raised in Tainan City, Taiwan.  Early in 2002 the family decided they would immigrate to New Zealand, the prospect of a better life and good education system were the reasons Tina’s parents chose New Zealand.Tina went to school in Auckland, she completed a Bachelor of International Hospitality Management in Accommodation, Food and Beverage from AUT in 2012

Nearly three years ago, well known cucumber grower, Neil Yearbury, sold his business in Drury, South Auckland.  The business was bought by a family friend of the Weng family.  At the time Tina, and her husband Randhir Tiwari, were living and working in Christchurch.  The new owner did not wish to grow herself, and needed someone she trusted to run the growing operation.   Tina was asked if she would be interested in growing cucumbers.  With no previous experience growing, the decision was made to accept the position and move back to Auckland.  An additional incentive was Tina’s mother lives in Auckland, so it meant she could be close to her.

When Neil, an extremely good grower, sold the business it was producing superb yields. Neil agreed to guide and mentor Tina, and pass on his vast wealth of growing knowledge.    Tina learnt very quickly, the systems Neil had in place were excellent which made it easier for her.   Tina has been growing for two and half years, supplying telegraph cucumbers from three greenhouses totalling an area of 4000 m2.   She has been able to maintain Neil’s very high standards and good production.  The property is served by one glasshouse and two plastic houses, it is heated by a gas boiler.

Tina is employed by ZZ Investments Ltd, they supply most of their produce to be marketed by Fresh Direct.  They don’t sell all of their cucumbers and have supplied cucumbers to charities such as McDonald house, Tzu Chi Foundation and school fundraising events.

 

It is obvious to see why Tina and Randhir are continuing to be successful.  The crop in this house is well balanced, the pest and disease levels are well under control.

 

Questions:

 

What do you find most challenging about growing?

 “I have faced many challenges since I started working in this business. This career is totally different compared to my previous jobs. For example, how to identify diseases, how to maintain the production, greenhouse maintenances, tractor services etc. There have been many new skills that I have had to learn.”

 

 What do you like most about growing?

“Watching the plants grow, from when they are first planted until they are mature plants with cucumbers on them.  You feel a sense of achievement, especially when you see eighteen-inch cucumbers. I also feel great when the boss visits us and appreciates our work. All these incentives drive us to provide safe and tasty cucumbers to the market”.

 

How do you feel about the future of growing Cucumbers?

“There is a great, long-term future for growing cucumbers, but need more young people to become involved in this industry, as well as need to bring new technical skill in.”

Close internodal distance is a feature of this crop.  Maximum numbers of fruit to the wire are achieved.

Not only has Tina totally changed her career to become a greenhouse manager, but she has recently had her first child, who is now 14 months of age.  Tina is a strong, determined young women who is focussed.  The juggling act of being a young mum and working full time is one thing, but to be fairly new to an industry like growing, producing high performing crop yields, 365 days a year is definitely an amazing achievement, one I fully respect. 

Most of Tina’s free time is spent with her family, she likes to relax and loves watching movies, listening to music and if she has time to go out and socialise with her friends. 

Cover photo is Tina with her husband Randhir Tiwari.

A new crop has recently been planted in the Glasshouse.  Information from the weigh scales along with water content meters are used to determine the irrigation strategy. Stone-wool is used as the growing media. Young plants supplied by Gellert Nurseries Ltd.

Randhir also run's the pack house opertation.

 

I appreciate your comments.  Please feel free to comment below or on the grower2grower Facebook page:

https://www.facebook.com/StefanGrower2grower/

Article Written by Stefan Vogrincic, Consultant, Grower2Grower

Categories
Greenhouse News

New Zealand Horticulture Conference, 23rd to 25th July Christchurch, Preview-

New Zealand Horticulture Conference, 23rd to 25th July Christchurch, Preview-

What’s in it for covered crops?

 

From the 23rd to 25th of July it is the Horticulture NZ Conference, being held in Christchurch at the Wigram Airforce Museum.  I will be attending on Tuesday 24th and hope to write a few articles on the presentations.

This year’s horticulture conference is a partnership between Horticulture New Zealand, New Zealand Apples and Pears, Vegetables New Zealand Inc, Tomatoes New Zealand Inc and Process Vegetables New Zealand. 

The Australian HFF and PCA conference’s, which has a large focus on hydroponic greenhouse production (that I highly recommend you attend), the NZ Horticulture conference has a broader audience to cater for.  Therefore, the topics and speakers don’t always interest or attract greenhouse growers.  This year the speakers, on the Tuesday, caught my attention and I feel the information from these speakers should be relevant and interesting for a large proportion of Grower2Grower readers.

 

I will be attending the following presentations;

10.15am -11am Constraints on Growing and Overcoming them

Andrew Barber & Jon Manhire, Agrilink
Sharon Forbes, Lincoln University
James Ryan, Ballance Farm Awards

Jon and Andrew are from the Sustainability Dashboard and will be talking about the project, the goal of which is to significantly enhance sustainability assessment and reporting in NZ's agricultural sector in response to increasing market, business improvement/resource use and regulatory drivers and requirements. They have case studies from NZ wines and NZ apples.

Sharon co-authored a paper on reporting on environmental impacts and how it can be used to prove the claims. James from the Ballance Farm Environment Awards is going to talk about social responsibility.

 

11.45 -13.00 The Post-Pesticide Age

Dr Alison Stewart, Foundation for Arable Research
Dr Charles ‘Merf’ Merfield, BHU Future Farming Centre
Dr Steve Wratten, Lincoln University
Robbie McCormick, Mr Apple

 

The Post Pesticide Age session is about looking at the alternatives to agrichemicals and how they are being developed for commercial horticulture. There is a wide variety of work going on within NZ science and industry to develop commercially applicable physical, biological and ecological pest management techniques. During the panel session delegates will hear about some of these from four experts and practitioners, including real-life examples of the techniques being successfully used, and have an opportunity to ask them questions.

 

1400- 1430 Keynote Speaker

Kok Hwee Ng , Zespri

Kok Hwee from Zespri will be talking about marketing and how it’s consumer-centric. Including examples from their marketing into Asia as an increasingly important market

 

14.30 – 15.00 Keynote Speaker

Dr Steve Wratten, Lincoln University

 

Next-generation bioprotection in a volatile horticultural era:

Agricultural and horticultural practices are increasingly being challenged for their lack of true sustainability, including high use of damaging inputs and misuse of oil-derived products and water. Frequent pest, weed, and disease invasions compound these problems, often mitigated mainly by prophylactic pesticides.

Recent findings published in Science magazine confirmed the presence of neonicotinoids in global honey samples (including those from New Zealand).

The Bio-Protection Research Centre is addressing these challenges by moving towards sustainable intensification – understanding and enhancing the ecosystem services that appropriate biodiversity provides.

In this presentation Prof Steve Wratten will outline this ‘future-farming’ system, driven by next-generation bio-protection. He will also give examples of current research in this highly topical approach to system redesign.

 

15.00 – 1600 Production Issues/Robots

Jamie Lunam, Jenkins Freshpac
 

Jamie will be discussing “People and Automation, the optimised kiwi pack house.” I.e.: machines in pack houses, and how they are not replacing people but that different skills will be needed in the pack house – e.g. people to operate the machines/technology.

 

 

Please let me know if you are not able to attend the conference yet would like a detailed report on any of the presentations I will be attending.   e-mail stefan@grower2grower.co.nz

Categories
Technical

Year-Round Strawberry Production

Growing in High Tech NZ Greenhouse Conditions

 

Article written by Mike Nichols

 

Traditionally in New Zealand strawberries are planted in the autumn, and flower in the spring, producing a crop of ripe strawberries in the early summer.   For this reason the growers who specialise in strawberry runner production have developed an effective  system which ensures a good supply of high health strawberry runners to the industry in the May/June period.,

In our early studies with greenhouse strawberry production I used runners (young plants) provided by the strawberry runner producers in Katikati.

There are essentially two main types of strawberries, the short day type, such as the variety Camerosa, which requires a period of short days (less than 12 hours of daylight per day) and may even require a short period of cooler temperatures in order to initiate flowers, and the day neutral types, such as Monterey, which initiate flowers irrespective of daylength, but may require a period cooler temperatures for good flower production.

Camerosa is still the main variety grown in the field in New Zealand, because of it’s large fruit size, and  good production in the pre-Christmas period.

Strawberry production under greenhouse conditions has many advantages over field cropping, including a marked reduction in fruit rots (due to no rain), better quality, no birds etc, but, of course at a capital cost.  In our initial trial we soon discovered that the long term productivity of the day neutral types far exceeded the short day varieties, although the short day varieties produced a very heavy daily harvest, but over a much shorter time.

The problem with the day neutral types is that fruit size tends to fall over time, and that the cost of harvesting strawberries is dependent on the size of the berries, as it is much, much cheaper to harvest large fruit (per kg) than small fruit.  The second problem is that as the runners only become available in May/June the greenhouse crop tends to mature over a very similar period (though of course slightly earlier) than the conventional outdoor crop.

Our approach was to develop a system of producing planting material (runners) year round, and to see what the performance of different varieties was with planting dates every month of the year.

The system of runner production we used was the tip runner system, in which the mother plants are grown (hydroponically) well above the ground, and the runners when they are produced are cut from the mother plant, and rooted in a growing medium under mist.  The resulting plants can then be grown on in larger containers (we use rock wool blocks), or planted out immediately.

For the past 2 years we have been able to harvest ripe strawberries every week of the year from a greenhouse in Palmerston North, where winter light conditions  are anything but ideal.

How long you can crop the plants for is a good question, as the very best fruit is produced by the youngest plants.  One approach may be to cut the plants back after say 3 months of cropping.  Another may be simply to replant at regular intervals—it is all an unknown area of endeavour. 

One other consideration is the economics of the whole operation, as “out of season” production strawberries can be imported relatively cheaply from Australia and California, but these come in with a biosecurity risk from fruit fly.

Note:  This work was undertaken with my colleague Damian Duggan-Jones who is now working for T&G International on their berryfruit project at Kerikeri.  

 

 

I appreciate your comments.  Please feel free to comment below or on the grower2grower Facebook page:

https://www.facebook.com/StefanGrower2grower/

Article written and supplied by Dr M A Nichols.  

 

 

Categories
Lighting

Gourmet Mokai – LED installation inspiring

Piet Hein van Baar from Philips presentation was informative and educational

 

Mid last year Gourmet Mokai decided to install LED’s on a large trial basis to increase their winter production of Campari.  Gourmet Mokai is the first company, in NZ, to install LED supplementary lighting for a commercially grown crop of tomatoes.  The selected site was a 4000m2 glasshouse situated at Mokai, which is growing the popular Campari truss tomatoes.  In other parts of the world supplementary lighting in greenhouses is not new, I remember back in 2007 LED’s were used by the company I was working for in England.  Since then the knowledge and technical advancements have improved immensely. 

Philips Lighting, now known as Signify, in conjunction with Gourmet Mokai hosted an open day on Wednesday the 8th of August at Mokai, near Taupo, New Zealand.   The day encompassed three presentations, a crop walk and discussion.  Over 60 growers and suppliers attended.  What impressed me the most was the technical growing knowledge Philips has gathered and how comprehensive their research is. 

Piet Hein van Baar, lighting specialist from Philips, presented a very compelling story backed up by real figures, as Piet said this is “no fake news”.  Presenting the percentage increase, one might achieve in their own production facility was a focus.  By using a grower’s crop and environmental data, Philips have come up with formulas which will help grower’s understand what they could potentially achieve growing with LED’s.  Philips are not just trying to sell you LED’s, they have employed plant specialists to help growers, which will be crucial in optimising the benefits of LED’s.  Regardless what variety you are growing their guidance and advice will be tailored to your requirements.

Part of the presentation was dedicated to the ‘spectrum of light’ and in this case the effects on plants, a comparison was then made between the capabilities LED’s have compared to High Pressure Sodium (HPS) lights and what they offer to the plant.  The level of blue and red light that LED’s supply, which is important for plant growth, is far superior to that of HPS. Grower’s in Belgium that were using HPS, are now either integrating HPS with LED’s or switching completely to LED’s.  Philips have come up with formulas to calculate different lighting options, how much power/m2 consumption there is and how much PAR light is achieved using combinations of HPS and LED’s and LED’s alone.  It is certainly evident from the figures that if you solely use LED’s you will use a lot less power and have sufficient PAR light for effective growth.

  • The numbers:

1, How many micro-mol of LED lighting would you need?

What you aim to achieve will determine how much light intensity is recommended.  Gourmet Mokai have installed a top light and an inter-light.  The installed light intensity for the top light is 125 µmol/m²/s. For the inter-light, the installed light inensity is 75 µmol/m²/s.  The inter-light plays an important role in increasing the photosynthesis of leaves which otherwise are inefficient. 

2, How much extra production will it give me?

Once you have figured out how much extra production supplementary lighting will potentially harvest, you then need to work out when it will give you that extra production.  If for example LED’s will give you an increase of 50% production on an annual basis, when are you achieving most of those gains?  The answer is during low light periods.  You should have the ability to produce consistent summer production during the winter, at winter pricing, from that you will be able to estimate the financial return from produce sold.  There will be a point during a year that unless you have very poor weather that the benefits of using LED’s are probably not going to give you better returns.  Having the option to use supplementary lighting in spring and summer still appeals to me. 

3, What is the extra running cost?

Power: To gain an accurate usage you would have to calculate the wattage usage the lights designed for you use, take those figures with suggested hours the lights would work and calculate power usage.  The suggestion from the trial is that it would double your power consumption during the periods you are using the LED’s.  Currently no growers in NZ to my knowledge use combined heat and power generators (CHP) so when you sit down with your lighting specialist you will need to figure out exactly how much extra power you will need and if your electricity supplier will be able to supply you. 

 

Other considerations:

 

  • Labour:  You will have increased labour, work on what you would use in the Summer.

 

  • Fertiliser: There will be have an increase in winter fertiliser cost.  Estimate using summer consumption.

 

  • Heating:  More heat input will be required to maximise the benefits.  Achieving the temperature in the middle of winter is a major consideration.   Growers who have screens will find it easier to maintain the extra temperature needed to grow a balanced crop. 

 

  • Screens:If you don’t have screens and were to either retrofit or if you are building from new then I would install black out screens which doubled up as thermal screens.  Light pollution regulations in built up areas would certainly only be a complaint away.  Kill two birds with one stone.

 

  • CO2:  A very good question was posed as to how effective the lights were if growers did not have supplementary CO2.   A number of growers do not grow with supplementary CO2 in NZ.  It was recommended that you should use CO2 and use a level of 600ppm as an average while the lights were on.  Even though many growers are without CO2 it would not be practical to vent at night when the lights are on to have ambient CO2 brought into your greenhouse, and if you did manage to keep a constant ambient CO2 level of around 400ppm you still would not capitalise on the extra benefits.  Therefore, the conclusion was if you cannot access CO2 this would probably not be a viable option.

 

  • How long are LED’s lifespan:  The LED lifespan is estimated at 35000 hours.  If you used your lights for six months of the year and had them on for 18 hours per day then you would use approximately 3200 hours per year, that would put the time to replace the lights at approximately eleven year interval.  They have calculated if you did not replace your LED’s until they reached 45000 hours that the last 10000 hours would still potentially give you 90% effectiveness. 

 

  • Capital Cost and time for return on investment:  There is a huge range of options available to growers, which suit the differing needs growers have, so the cost of installing the lights will vary, the estimation that was given was between $180-300 per m2.  The potential return on investment will be determined in part by the market prices and the skill of the grower to maximise yields but the time to get a return on your investment could be between 3-6 years. HPS lighting would be cheaper to install but the energy consumption would be higher.  HPS produces excess heat and reducing the effect this has on the head of the plant and how to ‘get rid’ of the excess heat is another consideration.  Greenhouse height and how far from the top of your head the lights are is important (especially HPS).  Ideally the higher your greenhouse, the better, however the Philips plant specialists will go through the options with you to find a solution.Initially most (but not all) growers will be hesitant to investigate installing LED’s because of the capital outlay.  This is certain, but with an increase in scale and ever improving technology, pricing in the future could become “more affordable”.   

 

  • Grow Pipes: Grow pipes are a great tool if you have inter-lighting as they keep the belly of the plant warm and this helps the transpiration.  I would highly recommend you have a grow pipe if you are considering top and inter-lighting.

 

  • Marketing: A major benefit is the certainty of production and being able to supply your market, especially during the winter period.  If it is a game changer for the grower it is also a game changer for the retailer which will give certainty of supply.

I would like to thank Piet Hein van Baar and Aart Slobbe for their presentations which were based on fact, science and real figures that growers are achieving.  It was a fascinating insight into the present and the future. 

It is extremely important growers have accurate costings and projected returns.  Philips have the resources which has made it much easier for growers to work through.  I would highly recommend investigating the potential of using LED’s if you can meet the criteria to achieve their full potential.

 

Photo Gallery:

Over 60 industry recognised people attended the open day and were treated to a look into the future. 

Pukekohe cherry tomato grower Peter Faucitt was just one of many greenhouse growers that attended the open day.

Piet  with Steve Dickson from Premier Seeds.

Photo clearly illustrating both the top light and inter light.

 

 

This article is an initial insight into LED’s.  There are many more technical questions that the lighting and plant experts from Philips (Signify) will be able to help you with.

I appreciate your comments.  Please feel free to comment below or on the grower2grower Facebook page:

https://www.facebook.com/StefanGrower2grower/

Article Written by Stefan Vogrincic, Consultant, Grower2Grower

Categories
Greenhouse News

Capsicum season underway

Is there potential for increased yield? 

 

It is that time of year again when most capsicum growers have planted for the new season.  Growers will already be seeing the first flowers and fruits forming.

I have always found capsicums to be a fascinating crop, they grow at a much slower rate than tomatoes but I have always felt they are less forgiving to mistakes.  If the wrong decisions, with temperature and plant loading, occur at the beginning of the season (of which light levels play a role) it will always be difficult to balance your crop and can be very hard to change a growth pattern for the entire season. If you need to alter the direction of a crop of tomatoes it is much easier to visually see the plants reaction to either a change in fruit loading or temperature in a relatively short period of time.

Whilst working for a nursery for nine years, many trials were carried out growing advanced plants for capsicum growers.   I firmly believe a strong generative flowering capsicum plant, at delivery, should be the goal.  Like many other greenhouse vegetable plants grown by a nursery an advanced plant, close to or flowering at delivery, has proven to be optimum.   One reason grower’s buy advanced plants is to reduce down time between the last harvest of the previous crop and the first harvest of the new crop, therefore an increase in production per annum.  Once I started growing advanced plants I realised another benefit, that balancing the crop was far easier at the beginning, I needed less temperature and my substrate dried down faster lessening the plants ability to go vegetative. A big advantage was the reduction in heating required (night time temperature) to ‘burn’ the excess energy off the plant to keep it balanced.

In my opinion for capsicum plants it is possibly even more important than tomatoes to get a strong generative flowering plant at delivery.  An observation, with some capsicum varieties, is that during a one-year cycle they grow too fast and reach the wire too quickly, the perception is if you plant an advanced plant that you will get to the wire even faster, but I am not so sure.  The fact the nursery has control of the plant in a relatively small block (volume) means they have the ability to manipulate the EC and WC in the growing media especially after day 30.  At this stage it is much easier to steer the plant.  Spacing plants in the nursery at the correct time will also lessen the competition for light, reducing stretching and help dry the block down faster.  The physical change this has on young capsicums is where the largest benefit for growers occurs receiving advanced plants.  It helps create a close internodal space between the leaves.  Using all of the tools available, the nursery from this point has total control over the plant. Another rather significant advantage for greenhouse growers in NZ is the two major nurseries now have supplementary lighting which will further allow stronger, balanced plants at delivery. 

With every solution there are always questions and observations made that ultimately convince the grower about the benefits of receiving advanced plants.   Capsicums, especially the older varieties, may not have root systems as vigorous as others.  Many years ago, I was advised that capsicum plants should be planted out in the greenhouse as soon as roots are visible at bottom of the propagation block to reduce the risk of damaging roots and preventing root disease from developing.  However, I don’t believe this should be a major factor for choosing advanced plants or not.  One company, that produces propagation material, has come up with a unique block which alters the pattern (or spread) of the root systems.  It has a substantial reduction in the number of roots forming at the bottom of the block during the propagation phase but once they are placed on top of the grower’s substrate, normal root establishment should occur. 

 

Limiting factors.

One limitation in NZ, is generally capsicum crops are re-planted from May to July.  Capsicum grower’s plant at large stem densities, which means a nursery would require a lot of ‘free space’ to grow advanced plants at a time of the year they are historically busy.   For larger growing areas of capsicum’s there will probably not be enough nursery space.  Unfortunately, as there is a need for extra space for only a short period of time it is probably not feasible for any nursery to expand to potentially accommodate for the share numbers of advanced capsicum plants needed.  Filling up the extra specially constructed nursery space with other crops during the following 9 months is not easy to do.  A nursery is like a hotel, it sells space and if the space is not filled there is still a cost and a return on investment that needs to be paid for, unlike produce growers whose space is filled 100% all year around, except when pulling out and cleaning in preparation for the arrival of a new crop.

If a nursery could accommodate you with advanced capsicum plants, I would purchase them. Ultimately these plants will give you an increase in yield and profit, especially if you consider picking your first set three weeks earlier than normal.  A faster return on energy should be accounted for as well.

Grafted Capsicum Plants (food for thought)

The potential of grafted capsicum plants is worth considering. Grafted plants will not only give you a stronger, more resilient root system but potentially allow either 3 or 4 stems to be on grown per plant without compromising production.  Initially this means you would need fewer plants at delivery, which in turn means less space a nursery needs to grow the quantity of plants you need to fill your greenhouse.   I believe that several seed companies, and their respective breeders, are working hard to develop new capsicum rootstocks.  There are several already in the market.  I will cover this in more detail, for capsicum growers, in a future article.

 

I appreciate your comments.  Please feel free to comment below or on the grower2grower Facebook page:

https://www.facebook.com/StefanGrower2grower/

Article Written by Stefan Vogrincic, Consultant, Grower2Grower

Categories
Industry Profile Lighting

Hans van Veen, learning to grow with LED’s

Head Grower, Tomatoes, Gourmet Mokai

 

At last weeks open day at Gourmet Mokai, head tomato grower Hans van Veen presentation focused on the hurdles he has had to overcome growing tomatoes using supplementary LED’ lighting.  The presentation was an insight to how the ‘mind set’ of the grower has to change and how he has had to acquire new techniques and skills to maximise the potential of using LED’s. LED lighting has been installed at Gourmet Mokai site to improve winter production and provide continuity of supply to the market.

Growing Techniques Hans has had to adjust to:

  • Irrigation:  Irrigation is normally triggered via the collection of accumulated light sum from the outside weather station, (or solar trigger) so there has been a need to change to irrigate on slab water content setpoints.  As the lights are turned on at midnight in the middle of winter you need to irrigate like you would during a normal day.  It is difficult to calculate the accumulated light sum, so a new technique is being used.  The approach has been to install Grodan Grosens and have them integrated with the environmental computer.  Hans now has the option to irrigate on water content targets he wants to achieve.  The plants are almost determining its own need for refreshment!  Irrigation from weigh scales could also be a possibility if set up correctly, and for growers in coir substrates it would be an alternative option.  You could irrigate on time but it is not accurate enough. The LED’s are generally on most days depending on the strength of the outside light levels, which again makes irrigation of solar trigger to inaccurate.

 

  • Turning the LED's on and off:  The two installations of top lighting and inter-lighting have different strength micro-mol.  The top light has 125 µmol/m²/s and the inter-light 75 µmol/m²/s.  Each installation will turn off at different outside calculated light intensities.  The top light will turn off at 350 watts and the inter-light at 450 watts.  Currently the lights are set to be available for 16 hours a day.  It is anticipated they could be used for up to 18 hours day for tomatoes.

 

  • Vegetative-Generative Balance: When you look at the stems you can see that the plants have at times been too strong, it has been a challenge to keep the plants generative.   Truss quality is affected if plants are not kept in balance.  Having more light has increased the vigour of the plants, so it is very important to keep focused on burning the extra plant energy and putting it either into the fruit or increased growth.  Stem density is a factor and understanding the best planting density with the amount of light achievable is important.

 

  • Labour:  Hans noted that during the winter period it is generally a time the staff worked ‘under less pressure’ but with the LED’s staff have had to get used to working in summer conditions all year round.

 

  • Insects: Under LED’s the bumble bees will not navigate sufficiently, so automatic bee hive openers/shutters are used, so that when the LED’s are switched on late at night the bees cannot leave the hives until the natural light comes in the morning. White fly is hard to manage as the extra temperature allows them to breed as they would in a normal summer, therefore more control options are required. 

 

  • Disease:Small amounts of leaf mould has been detected and botrytis especially by the door where the temperature can fluctuate.

 

  • Heating pipes: With LED inter-lighting (giving small amount of heat/radiation) and the minimum grow pipe temperature high, to keep the fruit and the leaf area warm, the pipe rail heating system on the ground was turned off, however this created a health and safety issue as the pipes condensate and became slippery, a minimum pipe was re-introduced on the pipe rail.

 

  • Temperature on Dark Days: Giving more heat input on a dark day is still something Hans is trying to adjust to. 

 

It has been a fast learning curve, Hans said “there is still an awful lot to learn”.  So far, he gives the LED’s the big thumbs up and is very positive about them.  I am sure we will here more about them in the future. 

 

I appreciate your comments.  Please feel free to comment below or on the grower2grower Facebook page:

https://www.facebook.com/StefanGrower2grower/

Article Written by Stefan Vogrincic, Consultant, Grower2Grower

Categories
Equipment

Robots Picking Capsicums

The future is coming whether you want it or not

“The SWEEPER robot is the first sweet pepper harvesting robot in the world demonstrated in a commercial greenhouse. It is designed to operate in a single stem row cropping system, with a crop having non-clustered fruits and little leaf occlusion. Tests were performed in a commercial greenhouse having a 2-row V-type cropping system. Preliminary test results showed that by using a commercially available crop modified to mimic the required conditions, the robot harvests ripe fruits in 24 seconds with a success rate of 62%. Based upon these results, the Sweeper consortium expects that a commercial sweet pepper harvesting robot will be available within 4-5 years. Further research is needed to make the robot work even faster and reach a higher harvest success rate. Next, a commercially viable single-stem row cropping must be developed and the breeding companies must develop crop cultivars that are more suitable for robotic harvesting. The obtained results can also be used for robotic harvesting of other crops. (Reference http://www.sweeper-robot.eu/11-news/48-sweeper-demonstrated-its-harvesting-robot-for-the-first-time you can also view a video demonstration via this webpage)

 

You may have recently heard or seen the new prototype capsicum robot picking machine.  It is undeniably brilliant, but still far from the finished article.  After I watched the video I read the comments posted in regards to the robot, to my bemusement over half of the comments were negative towards this machine. There is no doubt some people are worried about low income picking jobs that will be lost once inventions, like the capsicum picking robot, have been perfected but what are the drivers behind the need for such inventions.

It is all well and good to say inventions like this are going to be putting low income workers out of jobs, but innovation has been happening since the beginning of time.  We could quite easily say that tractors put horses and labourers out of jobs when they started ploughing through the fields.   This is just one of hundreds of examples that I could make but I think you understand my point.  Innovation and new technology are everywhere.  Emotion must be put to the side.  Common sense and more discussion need to happen so we have an understanding as to why growers want and need this type of technology to maintain and possibly expand their businesses.

The fact is for greenhouse growers labour is a major expense, and if your business is cutting a fine line between making a profit or not, and you have exhausted all other avenues, then labour will constantly be analysed. Despite what many may think growers don’t make huge profits.  Growers are generally not driving Jags and BMW’s.   I have been a grower and most that will read this are growers, so you understand.  For larger companies there is always pressure to increase profit levels year on year.  The reason I single out larger companies and not smaller ones is that they will possibly be the only ones able to purchase such robots initially because of the capital investment needed (I make an assumption that the picking robots will be expensive). 

Countries that have been investing into the picking robots are first world countries which have high labour cost compared to other countries where labour is relatively cheap, for example Mexico.  To stay competitive with countries with no, or extremely low, minimum wage is a key driver.   As we know here in New Zealand the minimum wage is going up, which is great for low income workers, but not so great for growers who can’t see a way in which they will recoup the increase they are going to have to pay.  Potentially the invention of the capsicum picking robot will give some advantage back to the growers who can afford to purchase them.   For the smaller grower whose payback might be slower, it will come down to numbers, the more robots that are purchased and manufactured, hopefully the more affordable they will become. I just hope smaller growing businesses are able to survive until they can afford such inventions.

There will be other huge advantages for growers, they won’t have to worry about having staff working on public holidays, paying extra holiday pay, ACC, PAYE, and the list goes on!  For people who are not growers you can’t just stop the plant growing on a Friday and come back and turn the switch back on Monday.  And if you have to pick every second or third day you are left with no options at certain times of the year to have staff work on public holidays.

Growers have no say in government policy, they are made by politicians believing they are doing the right thing, and I am for one not going to say they are wrong but their policies have forced the hands of growers which to be fair are creating jobs in other sectors in this case the design and manufacturing of robots.   Picking robots will need maintenance and a different potentially higher skilled worker to oversee them, which will also create jobs in the greenhouse.  My message is please do not blame growers or politicians, these are just the actions and reactions of policy.  Look at the positives.

A famous quote from Albert Einstein

Stay away from negative people.  They have a problem for every solution.

 

If you wish to read more on this subject, I was alerted to the following article:

The idea that manual work can be carried out by machines is already familiar; now ever-smarter machines can perform tasks done by information workers, too. What determines vulnerability to automation, experts say, is not so much whether the work concerned is manual or white-collar but whether or not it is routine.

Yet in the past technology has always ended up creating more jobs than it destroys. That is because of the way automation works in practice, explains David Autor, an economist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Automating a particular task, so that it can be done more quickly or cheaply, increases the demand for human workers to do the other tasks around it that have not been automated.

(To read more click the link below)

https://www.economist.com/special-report/2016/06/25/automation-and-anxiety

 

Pictures of the Sweeper below:

I appreciate your comments.  Please feel free to comment below or on the grower2grower Facebook page:

https://www.facebook.com/StefanGrower2grower/

Article Written by Stefan Vogrincic, Consultant, Grower2Grower

 

Categories
Industry Profile

Growing on the West Coast

Last week, after attending the NZ Horticulture Conference in Christchurch, I visited Karamea Growers who have 1.2ha of greenhouses growing loose and specialty tomatoes.  There are three greenhouses on the property all with late summer or early autumn plantings. To get to Karamea from Christchurch we drove via Lewis Pass onto the West Coast.  The trip took over five hours, but the stunning, changing scenery made the trip seem a lot shorter.  The remote location of Karamea Growers is unique to any other growing operation in New Zealand.  There are both advantages and disadvantages for this property, the obvious disadvantage being the distance to Christchurch the main market for the produce.  It has just become routine for Tom, co-owner of the business, to transport the Tomatoes from Karamea to Westport twice a week in the winter and three times a week in the summer.  The tomatoes are then transferred to a freight company which backloads their produce to Christchurch.  Tom then backloads goods for the greenhouse and the community of Karamea, a population of approximately 500.   The system works really well and offsets the cost of the transport, which makes the trip viable.

 

The remote location is one disadvantage, the other includes the climate.  Light levels are low during the winter, Karamea is actually similar to Nelson in light hours, however there is a higher rainfall to contend with contributing to higher humidity’s to deal with.  This makes advising here different to other locations and the close proximity to the Tasman Sea means storms and high winds are a constant threat.   Travelling to Karamea, to advise, generally includes an early start to the day, two flights and a ninety-minute drive from Westport, it is possible to be on site by 2-3pm the same day.  It is not hard to visit when the scenery is so breath taking, but there is a cost for such travel which makes using crop registration and technology available extremely important.

 

I have pointed out the downsides but the upsides far out way the downsides for growing in such a remote location.  Attracting locals to work in the greenhouses has been of huge benefit for both Karamea growers and the community.  Rochelle Trethowen, co-owner and Head Grower has a great and loyal team of local workers.  The advantage, having long term staff is very valuable in helping the business maintain its success.  Transport to and from work for most of the staff is easy with the town only a few kilometres from the greenhouse.  It sure beats sitting in Auckland traffic! The primary energy being used to heat the greenhouses’ is coal, being so close to the raw resource has a large saving in the cost of transporting the coal.  Controlling insects is still a battle but the amount of pressure, compared to other greenhouse growing areas, gives Karamea growers a real advantage for successful continued pest control.   

 

It is truly a unique property, there is no other like it in New Zealand.    Its stunning location, so close to national parks and beautiful West Coast beaches, is a huge attraction.  There is no traffic congestion or a set of traffic lights in sight.  Karamea Growers is a great example of how important and viable the greenhouse industry is not just in the larger centres but to our smaller communities. 

 

I took this picture while we were driving through Lewis Pass last Wednesday.

 

I appreciate your comments.  Please feel free to comment below or on the grower2grower Facebook page:

https://www.facebook.com/StefanGrower2grower/

Article Written by Stefan Vogrincic, Consultant, Grower2Grower